• Weight-Size 15 US/Pair 761 grams
  • Cost $180.00

Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Mens Shoe


8.1 / 10

Value for Money           1.5

Durability                    1.6

Comfort                      1.6

Weight                        1.9

Support/Stability         1.5

Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Mens Shoe Review

As someone on the upper end of the shoe sizes, I’m usually a size 14US, I eagerly await anything that will fit given that many manufacturers only cater for the masses and not for those of us with clown feet. As a manuafacturer Altra continues to release new versions of existing models as well as bringing new models onto a rapidly growing range of shoes coming onto the Australian market. More importantly the retailers bring the larger sizes into Australia. Earlier this year I had the opportunity to try out the updated version of my much loved Altra Lone Peak 3.0, the Lone Peak 3.5, and now having done over 200km in a variety of conditions its time for a full review.

Like most shoe manufactures Altra has features that it is known for and across the range they produce zero drop shoes that have a foot shaped toe box. What this means is that this shoe is very close to being barefoot in that your toes aren’t cramped and the well padded foot bed doesn’t lean your forward, but instead provides a strange being the first time you wear them as you just feel more upright. Having fallen in love with the Altra Lone Peak 3.0’s I had high expectations  of this updated version. So how did I go?

As usual lets start with the negatives. For some reason Altra decided to increase the padding at the rear of the shoe. I’m guessing that some people must have complained on this but personally I didn’t really think that this wasn’t necessary. In fact for me it created a very obvious negative as I have now gone up a size from size 14(US) to size 15(US). This extra padding is obvious when you put the two versions together. I struggled enough as it was to get size 14’s so it was no surprise that the retailer had to do a special order of size 15’s from the manufacturer in the USA, grrrrrr. For me this was the only real negative.

The three obvious changes are hard to pick unless you again sit the older and newer versions side by side. These changes include a slightly different mesh which help to minimise the fine powered dust that used to get into the older models but even with this change it still remains breathable. They have small slots, either side of the toe box to allow water to drain if you have been walking through wet environments. And last but not least there are now only 6 rows of eyelets rather than 7 on the older model. Less eyelets potentially means less adjustment but this wasn’t something that I noticed in practice.

I initially purchased a pair of size 14’s expecting them to be identical sizing to the previous model and while I will end up using them they don’t work for me on hills as my feet are permanently up again the front of the shoe. If you do order online choose a company that has a good return policy just in case and try them on around the house as the sizing runs  little small.

What has remained the same with this newer model is that they are a supremely comfortable shoe. While zero drop shoes aren’t for everyone I do love them. My feet are wide at the front an narrow at the back so the natural shape of these shoes fits me like a glove. A good guide for me is that in testing these on 20km of bitumen and concrete paths this shoe always performs well. Traction on the soles hasn’t changed and as such they grip will on powdery slopes as well as wet conditions.

Now these shoes are a trailer runner and as such 1000km distance is about what you will get out of these before the sole wears thin. Having said that you will have a supremely comfortable shoe over that time. As a hiker who uses trail runners for a majority of his hikes these shoes are a great option. They came very close to being my shoe of choice for my 1000km bibbulmun Track hike and it was really only the need to order two more pairs from the USA that ultimately put me off choosing them over the Merrell FST’s that’s I ultimately went with.

If you like the zero drop concept, have broad feet, and are into trail runners then these are a great option.

Altra Lone Peak 3.5 mens trail runner

We like

  • These are some of the lightest pair of hiking shoes that I own and after long days hiking this makes a difference
  • I noticed the zero drop construction of these as soon as a I put them on and found it strange after using shoes for years that have had a 10 mm+ drop from the back to the front of the shoe. I find that the zero drop does make me stand up straighter rather than tending to lean forward
  • I like having a wide toe box. I tried a pair of Keen Targhee’s over the past couple of years and they are too wide for me. The Altra’s are in that Goldilocks zone for me and is ‘just right’ allowing my toes room to move without feeling like they are swimming inside the shoe
  • They cushioning has lasted well and like the previous model I would expect 1000km of use. The thing that ill make you throw them away is the loss of traction.
  • I particularly like this cushioning layer on concrete, bitumen, and hard management trails
  • They traction is good on a variety of surfaces and while it doesn’t excel in any particular area
  • They breathe well so your feet don’t overheat. They also dry reasonably quickly in warm weather when they get wet
  • The toe guard provides good protection for the front of the foot
  • The ‘Gaiter Trap’ works well with the lycra style gaiters

What don't like

  • The sizing is a nuisance if you do have large feet. This is not a criticism aimed specifically at this shoe and the retailers are usually willing to order the large sizes so long as you are willing to commit.

Best uses

  • Groomed trails that aren’t littered with rocks
  • For hikers with a wide forefoot and a narrowish heel
  • Where you want good cushioning

Buy One

You can purchase the Altra Lone Peak 3.5 Mens shoe at Wildfire Sports or at Wild Earth

Please note that our affiliations do not influence, in any way, the independence of our gear reviews

If you have used the Altra Lone Peak 3.5 or if you have questions, we’d like to here from you. Post your comment or question below

Other Versions

  • Womens version Altra Lone Peak 3.5
  • The Altra Lone Peak 3.5 also comes in a mid version which provides greater ankle support and protection
  • Altra does a range of other shoes however Lone Peak is best known in the long distance trail circuit rather than as a hiking shoe look at these as an option if your into trail running

Front view of the Altra Lone Peak 3.5(left) vs the Altar Lone Peak 3.0(right). The main differences are the drain holes in the newer model and a slight difference in the shape of the protective toe guard

Altra Lone Peak 3.5(left) vs Altra Lone Peak 3.0(right). The mesh on the newer model breathes well but is better at keeping fine dust out of the inside of the shoe

Top and bottom view on Lone Peak 3.5

These shoes come with a ‘Gaiter Trap’ which is a fancy name for a velcro tab designed to suit the Altra Gaiters and will also work with the Dirty Girl Gaiters as well. The gaiters are only designs to keep ‘stuff’ out of your shoes which is a godsend in sandy or burr ridden environments

Shoe insert. These shoes are zero drop so if you do replace the insert ensure that you don’t alter this feature by adding the wrong insert

Altra Lone Peak 3.5(left) vs Altra Lone Peak 3.0(right). Notice the much plusher padding at the rear of the shoe on the Altra Lone Peak 3.5(left). This additional padding will push you up a shoe size from the Altra Lone Peak 3.0


This review was done with product purchased from a retail store by the reviewer

Australian Hiker Newsletter

* indicates required